On January 9, 2025, the Supreme Court of India dismissed review petitions challenging its October 2023 verdict, which declined to grant legal recognition to same-sex marriages. The five-judge bench, comprising Justices B.R. Gavai, Surya Kant, B.V. Nagarathna, P.S. Narasimha, and Dipankar Datta, considered the review pleas in chambers and found no apparent error in the original judgment, concluding that no interference was warranted.
In the October 2023 decision, the Supreme Court unanimously held that the legalization of same-sex marriages falls within the purview of Parliament, not the judiciary. The court emphasized that any change in the legal recognition of marriage should be addressed through legislative processes.
The dismissal of the review petitions reaffirms the court’s stance that the issue of same-sex marriage legalization is a matter for legislative consideration. As a result, same-sex marriages remain unrecognized under Indian law, with any potential changes requiring action by Parliament.
Sign Up on mentblue here: 
And check out each of mentblue offerings here:
The Supreme Court’s May 13, 2025 judgment has fundamentally revised the process for designating Senior Advocates, moving away from a rigid points-based system and placing greater value on holistic qualities central to the legal profession.
In a highly unusual development, the Supreme Court has ordered liquidation of Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. even after the resolution plan was approved, the amount paid, and implementation had commenced-an extraordinary outcome almost never witnessed under India’s insolvency regime. The Court’s decision to set aside JSW Steel’s resolution plan underscores that gross violations of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be cured by mere payment or partial ...
Let’s consider a startup working on prototypes that are both aesthetically crafted and functionally driven, with innovators eager to protect their creations. While copyright is often the go-to protection for creative works, a dilemma arises under Section 15(2) of the Copyright Act. This provision withdraws copyright from certain works once they are commercially reproduced, unless protected under the Designs Act. In Cryogas v. Inox, the Supreme Court attem...