Historic Legislative Move: The Karnataka Legislative Assembly has passed a motion that recognizes a limited “Right to Die,” allowing patients in terminal or irreversible conditions to opt for passive euthanasia, which includes withdrawing life support after thorough medical evaluation and approval processes. This aligns with the Supreme Court’s earlier rulings on euthanasia and end-of-life care in India.
Framework for Implementation: The new guidelines establish a framework for medical boards in hospitals to certify requests for dignified deaths. This involves a primary board at the hospital level and a secondary board at the district level, ensuring that decisions are made with proper oversight.
Legal Clarity: This move is notable as it provides clarity on the often-misunderstood concepts of “living wills” and advance directives, enhancing legal protections for individuals wishing to refuse or withdraw medical interventions.
Concerns and Support: While supporters view this as a step toward affirming human dignity and autonomy, critics express concerns about potential misuse and the need for robust safeguards to protect vulnerable patients from coercion.
Next Steps: Local health authorities are expected to issue detailed directives and counseling procedures shortly, aimed at educating medical professionals and families about the legal and ethical guidelines associated with these decisions.
The Supreme Court’s May 13, 2025 judgment has fundamentally revised the process for designating Senior Advocates, moving away from a rigid points-based system and placing greater value on holistic qualities central to the legal profession.
In a highly unusual development, the Supreme Court has ordered liquidation of Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. even after the resolution plan was approved, the amount paid, and implementation had commenced-an extraordinary outcome almost never witnessed under India’s insolvency regime. The Court’s decision to set aside JSW Steel’s resolution plan underscores that gross violations of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code cannot be cured by mere payment or partial ...
Let’s consider a startup working on prototypes that are both aesthetically crafted and functionally driven, with innovators eager to protect their creations. While copyright is often the go-to protection for creative works, a dilemma arises under Section 15(2) of the Copyright Act. This provision withdraws copyright from certain works once they are commercially reproduced, unless protected under the Designs Act. In Cryogas v. Inox, the Supreme Court attem...