Introduction
The Italian Data Protection Authority (“Garante”) imposed a €15 million fine on OpenAI for General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) non-compliance in an earlier version of ChatGPT. This follows a temporary ban in April 2023, which prompted OpenAI to enhance GDPR alignment. While Garante acknowledged OpenAI’s cooperative efforts, the penalty highlights the EU’s strict stance on data protection
Regulatory Context
When ChatGPT launched in November 2022, the GDPR implications for GAI were not fully addressed. Since then however the regulators have adopted and increased pressure for compliance. Nonetheless, the Garante recognized OpenAI’s intention for cooperation yet stood firm in the enforcement of GDPR in order to respond to accountability in innovative processes.
Implications of the Fine
The €15 million fine as well as the €20 million fine against Clearview AI, concerns the question of proportionality. These speculations are fuelled by OpenAI, that was a start-up at the time and has previously shown desire for enhancement; the fines could conceivably have a chilling effect on developer by discouraging advancements or driving them to find jurisdictions with less extreme rules.
Broader Concerns
The AI chatbot has angered European regulators as of now there are 14 investigations against ChatGPT running and it threatens to impose a string of fines that might lead to a Clearview AI type of regulation. For example, there is a possibility that they can dramatically shift the dynamics of innovation on the one hand and protection of individuals' data, on the other hand.
The Way Forward
According to the EDPB, this argument is useful because GDPR is not keen on preventing innovation but expects innovators to be responsible. In the future, the idea of combining the penalties with more tolerant guidance is worth pursuing. Thus, Europe can keep on leading the development of tools and applications while preserving adequate levels of data protection.
Sign Up on mentblue here: 
And check out each of mentblue offerings here:
While the legislative framework of criminal justice has undergone structural changes, the core principles remain steadfast. These foundational tenets continue to be upheld through judicial precedents, ensuring consistency in legal interpretation and application. The Supreme Court, through its judgments, bridges the transition from IPC/CrPC to BNS/BNSS, reinforcing that while the nomenclature and procedural aspects may evolve, the essence of justice remains...
Supreme Court, today, granted interim protection from arrest to YouTuber and podcaster Ranveer Allahbadia (𝗕𝗲𝗲𝗿 𝗕𝗶𝗰𝗲𝗽𝘀) in connection with multiple FIRs filed against him over alleged obscene remarks made on the YouTube show ‘𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗮’𝘀 𝗚𝗼𝘁 𝗟𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁’.
In a recent Judgment, the Supreme Court of India held that obtaining prior approval of the Competition Commission of India is mandatory before presenting a Resolution Plan involving a combination to the Committee of Creditors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC).