Introduction
The Italian Data Protection Authority (“Garante”) imposed a €15 million fine on OpenAI for General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) non-compliance in an earlier version of ChatGPT. This follows a temporary ban in April 2023, which prompted OpenAI to enhance GDPR alignment. While Garante acknowledged OpenAI’s cooperative efforts, the penalty highlights the EU’s strict stance on data protection
Regulatory Context
When ChatGPT launched in November 2022, the GDPR implications for GAI were not fully addressed. Since then however the regulators have adopted and increased pressure for compliance. Nonetheless, the Garante recognized OpenAI’s intention for cooperation yet stood firm in the enforcement of GDPR in order to respond to accountability in innovative processes.
Implications of the Fine
The €15 million fine as well as the €20 million fine against Clearview AI, concerns the question of proportionality. These speculations are fuelled by OpenAI, that was a start-up at the time and has previously shown desire for enhancement; the fines could conceivably have a chilling effect on developer by discouraging advancements or driving them to find jurisdictions with less extreme rules.
Broader Concerns
The AI chatbot has angered European regulators as of now there are 14 investigations against ChatGPT running and it threatens to impose a string of fines that might lead to a Clearview AI type of regulation. For example, there is a possibility that they can dramatically shift the dynamics of innovation on the one hand and protection of individuals' data, on the other hand.
The Way Forward
According to the EDPB, this argument is useful because GDPR is not keen on preventing innovation but expects innovators to be responsible. In the future, the idea of combining the penalties with more tolerant guidance is worth pursuing. Thus, Europe can keep on leading the development of tools and applications while preserving adequate levels of data protection.
Sign Up on mentblue here: 
And check out each of mentblue offerings here:
In My Preferred Transformation and Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. M/s Faridabad Implements Pvt. Ltd., the Supreme Court delved into the interplay between the Limitation Act, 1963, and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (ACA). The case centered on whether the benefit of Section 4 of the Limitation Act—which extends deadlines when courts are closed—applies to the 30-day condonable period under Section 34(3) of the ACA. The appellants filed an applic...
On January 10, 2025, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi appeared virtually before a Pune court in connection with a defamation case filed by Satyaki Savarkar, the grandnephew of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar. The case pertains to alleged derogatory remarks made by Gandhi about the Hindutva ideologue during a speech in London in 2023.
On January 9, 2025, the Supreme Court of India dismissed review petitions challenging its October 2023 verdict, which declined to grant legal recognition to same-sex marriages. The five-judge bench, comprising Justices B.R. Gavai, Surya Kant, B.V. Nagarathna, P.S. Narasimha, and Dipankar Datta, considered the review pleas in chambers and found no apparent error in the original judgment, concluding that no interference was warranted.