Author: Shreyasi Pal
From personalized recommendations in every scroll to daily task automation through ‘smart assistants’ to predicting major health and financial decisions, the crux of Machine Learning (ML) and Large Language Models (LLMs) work on the principle of processing vast amounts of ‘data’ which constitutes the information of users which is often private and sensitive. This “black box” approach of data collection and processing without awareness and consent leaves a lingering potential of data breach and has resulted in unwanted consequences like deep fakes, underscoring the loopholes in the legislation to address the matter.
๐๐๐ฃ๐ฅ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ต๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ ๐๐ฒ๐ด๐ถ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) stands as the most comprehensive legal framework addressing data privacy within the European Union (EU). Enforced since May 25, 2018, GDPR mandates strict regulations on how personal data is collected, processed, and stored. It emphasizes accountability for data controllers and processors while ensuring the integrity and confidentiality of personal information.
Besides this, Article 5 of Chapter 2 in GDPR further introduces the concepts of ‘purpose limitation’ and ‘data minimization’ which aims to limit data processing to ‘legitimate causes’ of data processing. The principle of free consent along with the right to withdrawal is highlighted in Article 7.
Chapter 3 broadly discusses the parameters of transparency of processing users’ data from the end of the controller through the objectives in Article 13 and 15 of Section 2. Section 3 of the same chapter extends control measures for the user pertaining to personal data through measures of rectification, erasure and restriction of processing signifying increased control of personal data.
GDPR has set a reference as a global standard for data collection, processing and its intersections with privacy, especially by empowering individuals with data control. However, the terms of ‘free consent’ to collect data and limiting processing to ‘legitimate causes’ still remain vague with highly complicated applications for both data controllers and users. There is a need for standardized guidelines for an in-depth insight on the terms of ‘data minimization’ and a clarity on procedural layout of objection, restriction and withdrawal.
๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐ป๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ
AI algorithms process large volumes of data to predict and produce information out of the same, monitor financial and health related data to detect anomalies and can generate ‘synthetic data’ which is entirely new and potentially hypothetical. This feature of 'derived data' adds a new layer to the concern of privacy, ethics and regulation. While GDPR provides foundational protections, it lacks specific provisions tailored to address the complexities introduced by AI-generated data.
To enhance safeguards around derived data, several measures can be considered:
• Blockchain Technology: Utilizing decentralized systems for data storage can increase security.
• Controlled Sharing: Implementing tokenization and encryption can protect data during processing.
• Informed Consent: Establishing a streamlined process for obtaining user consent can empower individuals with greater control over their personal information.
The overarching goal is to foster a system that prioritizes transparency, accountability, and integrity while allowing users to maintain control over their data. By implementing appropriate safeguards, AI can significantly improve the management of personal information through automation and anonymization.
๐๐ผ๐ป๐ฐ๐น๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป
As AI continues to evolve and integrate into various sectors, the intersection of technology and privacy law becomes increasingly critical. While GDPR serves as a global benchmark for data protection, ongoing efforts are necessary to adapt regulatory frameworks to address emerging challenges posed by AI. By enhancing clarity around consent and developing AI-specific guidelines, stakeholders can work towards a future where innovation does not come at the expense of individual privacy rights.
#DataPrivacy #AIethics #DataProtection #GDPR #PrivacyMatters #TechForGood #ArtificialIntelligence #MachineLearning #DataSecurity #SmartTechnology #DataRegulation #PrivacyLaw #DigitalRights #ConsentManagement #ProtectYourData #PrivacyAwareness #UserRights #EmpowerUsers #Legal #News #India
In an era where data is the new currency, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) is taking bold steps to regulate Big Tech, ensuring that consumer rights and privacy are prioritized. Recent actions against Meta, including a substantial โน213.14 crore penalty for anti-competitive practices and directives to WhatsApp regarding user data sharing, highlight a significant shift in the regulatory landscape. By enforcing transparency and user control over personal data, the...
The Ministry of Commerce and Industry had recently sought public comments and suggestions regarding proposed amendments to the Geographical Indication of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999. This initiative, led by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT), invites feedback from stakeholders and the general public....
The news agency ANI has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging unauthorized use of its original news content, marking a significant legal challenge in India concerning artificial intelligence and intellectual property rights. This case is set to be heard by Justice Amit Bansal in the Delhi High Court today....